Misleading title, implies national but only for one state

losvedir 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

No, the article has an Alaska focus because it's some Alaskan news agency, but I believe it's a nation-wide block. The judge in question is based in Massachusetts.

Side note, but I'm sort of surprised that this "level" of judge (I think there's almost 700 of them in the country) is able to block these orders. It seems like almost no executive order is possible if you need a unanimous agreement of 700 people.

	▲	returningfory2 4 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Recently the Supreme Court has curtailed these nationwide injuctions: https://www.scotusblog.com/2025/06/supreme-court-sides-with-...

▲

albert_e 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

There was a ruling in Boston also, reported separately.

> U.S. District Judge Leo Sorokin in Boston issued the ruling in a lawsuit filed by 20 Democratic state attorneys general challenging a fee Trump announced in September

https://www.reuters.com/world/trumps-100000-h-1b-visa-fee-is...

https://edition.cnn.com/2026/06/08/politics/federal-judge-vo...

▲

QGQBGdeZREunxLe 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

States don't regulate immigration.