I thought locking down H1Bs actually had bipartisan support?

How can you argue there aren't enough jobs, and support H1Bs to fill jobs?

I can see Alaska's case since encouraging people to move there very well may be a requirement, but surely there's somewhere between $0 and $100k that would convince someone to move there.

▲

fhfbfbtbt 6 hours ago | parent [-]

You’re putting words in people’s mouths. The fact that people oppose this solution doesn’t mean they disagree with the problem. We oppose it because it’s stupid; it’s the first solution that a dim-witted eight-year-old would’ve come up with.

The program needs to be reformed so it only applies to people with skills that genuinely cannot be found domestically.

Given the difference in expected engineering salaries for many citizens/permanent residents and foreigners/temporary residents, $100,000 is not an effective way of making that happen.

▲

horns4lyfe 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

If people that think like you had actually done something about it, then we wouldn’t be to this point. But at this point the only people taking action are trumps, and if that’s the only solution being offered, it will be taken. The conversation here is mild, get the room temp on this issue outside of lib tech circles and you’ll see

	▲	mindslight 3 hours ago \| parent [-]
		So after 4 years, or whenever this con man finally has the decency to keel over, is everyone who supported these performative non-solutions simply to "be heard" (or however else they frame their emotional release) going to own up to the fact that they've burnt all the political capital on the issues they care about? Or are they going to blame their predictable failures on "libuhruls" and go right back to whinging while waiting for the next con man who might pay them lip service?

▲

jojobas 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

If you genuine shortage is not worth some 33k a year, it's not a genuine shortage.