| ▲ | awesome_dude 4 hours ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AI uses a high confidence tone - likely because its training data is heavy on authoritative texts/reference books. And it does get people into a lot of trouble. I have got into trouble with it when it is extremely confident about something I am not very familiar with (as recently as two weeks ago with Claude). I have also had long drawn out "arguments" when I have known it's wrong based on my experience and intuition, and it has steadfastly refused to take my point (last week) I have learnt to ask it why it was doing something that has turned out to be incorrect, as a post-mortem, and it's all apologetic and subservient and "never going to do that again" (but still does as soon as the context window shifts [eg. run git commands, or, yesterday, kept telling me to use commands that were explicitly communicated to Claude as not being available, and completely wrong - I was shifting from one tech stack to another and Claude kept telling me the original commands, not the new ones]) I'm expecting Claude to be a better search engine - I have spent literal years (if not decades) knowing that asking the right question is what's required to get the right answer, and LLM's natural language processing is what's supposed to make that easier than using Google or grep, or even Stack Overflow - but the reality is that I still have to be on my toes, especially when I am drifting into territory I am unfamiliar with. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | operatingthetan 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
>And it does get people into a lot of trouble. Pretty much everyone takes it at face value unless we know otherwise from prior experience. Even the most advanced models make embarrassing mistakes and fumble with simple tasks. Yet we are very willing to give them exceptional slack for it? I wish I knew why. Are people just that easily overcome by confident voices? | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | airstrike 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> I have also had long drawn out "arguments" when I have known it's wrong based on my experience and intuition, and it has steadfastly refused to take my point (last week) Ironically, trying to argue with Claude about the limitations of LLMs and AI in general today is quite hard. It refuses to yield, likely due to Anthropic tweaking it aggressively | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||