Not to interrupt the predictable HN hates women train but

>she noted in the past every time she tried running FreeBSD on laptops [...]

It's very explicit that she has in fact tried this in the past. She's not some diversity hire, either. She's a former embedded firmware developer at IBM, IIRC.

Have you ever tried running FreeBSD on a laptop? I have. Unless you're using it plugged in at all times and never take it anywhere it has not historically been a very pleasant experience, hence this recent push to bring it into parity with Linux from the 2010s.

I think you’re the one focusing on gender.

Do you still need to run a Linux VM to get WiFi working? The last time I tried FreeBSD on a laptop, that was a thing. It’s just never been all that focused on laptop/mobile use. I’ve used it as a desktop (okay) and as a server (wonderful). But laptop/daily driver use has just never been a focus. Especially if you are running on a battery or wifi - it’s certainly usable as a desktop/workstation with Ethernet.

I don’t entirely fault FreeBSD for this either - it’s not where they see their niche. So, when you have comparatively limited engineering resources, they shouldn’t be wasting them on areas where their users don’t need them. I personally think that dogfooding your own OS makes for a better OS, but there are already decent laptop OS options.

Focusing on server deployments that don’t need much in terms of graphics or consumer wifi chip support isn’t that big of deal to me.

> Not to interrupt the predictable HN hates women train but

Oh rubbish.

When you're the head of something, you're paid to use their products if not for anything but image purposes.

Do you think the head of GM drives around in a Mustang?