| ▲ | 0xbadcafebee 4 hours ago | |
You should definitely stick to the $200 plan, and not try the $10 coding plans with open weight models and higher limits. Anthropic needs your money to stay solvent, and you'll sleep better knowing you're using SOTA. | ||
| ▲ | port11 39 minutes ago | parent [-] | |
(Zero reason to defend Anthropic.) I’ve gone that route. I really wanted to stop using Claude, but Deepseek v4 Pro and Kimi 2.6 didn’t do the job. For a lot of coding tasks or well-specced plans, maybe… but then that’s a plan made by Opus anyway. Even Sonnet is sometimes not worth the trouble. Opus is very thorough and reviews its own mistakes quite well. Catches a lot of edge cases. I’m not saying we shouldn’t try other things — I did! —, but it’s more or less okay that people just like Claude Code subscriptions? The back and forth I had with Kimi on a small feature came out to ~1.8€, which is 10% of my Claude subscription each month. And that was a single session. CC with Serena uses tokens fairly well. | ||