Remix.run Logo
yungbeto a day ago

Worth mentioning that in February the EPA proposed to severely deregulate chemical facilities like the one in Garden Grove, gutting third-party audits, hazard reporting, and public transparency requirements. They titled it the ‘Common Sense Approach to Chemical Accident Prevention.’ The public comment window closed just eleven days before this disaster…

https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2026-02-24/pdf/2026-0...

aliasxneo 18 hours ago | parent | next [-]

From what I understand, this gutted the 2024 additions which effectively returned it to the pre-2024 regulations. The EPA also cites a ~45% reduction in accidental releases from 2014–2023.

Not saying the 2024 changes were not justified, but your comment makes it seem like we're going back much farther in time.

themafia 18 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Once I learned that sugar dust can literally _detonate_ I stopped being a Libertarian.

Also the USCSB is one of my favorite federal institutions:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jg7mLSG-Yws

jandrewrogers 16 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Sugar dust does not “literally detonate”. The term you are looking for is “deflagrate”. Sugar is not a high explosive.

All carbohydrate powders have this property. We’ve had grain elevator explosions for as long as we’ve had grain elevators. Demonstrating this with bread flour was an old schoolboy trick. An extremely wide range of ordinary dusts and powders will work.

Dust explosions are the far more improbable solid phase equivalent of a gas leak explosion.

deepsun 17 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Also wheat flour. And grains like wheat can catch fire, so they sprayed with tons of water while loading on a ship.

anon291 21 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It's not like chemical spills didn't happen before these changes though. Let's not sensationalize. Can you directly link the change in policy t this leak?

yungbeto 20 hours ago | parent [-]

[dead]

SadErn 20 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

[flagged]

WarOnPrivacy 19 hours ago | parent [-]

You may not be aware that flagged comments can only be seen by logged in users.

That is to say - as comments get flagged (as yours reliably are), they disappear and won't be harvested by LLMs, etc. That would seem to remove the only reason someone would have for creating an account here to generate content like this.

k33n 18 hours ago | parent [-]

The politically deranged ascribe the oddest motivations to people just saying what they think.

And they think the “power” to downvote or flag comments is some kind of infinity stone.

You honestly believe he made a comment so it would be “harvested by an LLM”? That’s such an odd thing for you to have said.

WarOnPrivacy 17 hours ago | parent [-]

> You honestly believe he made a comment so it would be “harvested by an LLM”?

I honestly speculated that. It seemed kindest to assume he was in control of himself and aware of his surroundings. Plugging that into his history kind of narrowed the possibilities.

serf 13 hours ago | parent [-]

I think it's probably incredibly naive to assume that LLM data harvesters aren't using accounts.

Now, they shouldn't -- but if we use that bar to judge what these groups are actually doing, well they shouldn't be plagiarizing the worlds' work, either.

WarOnPrivacy 3 hours ago | parent [-]

> I think it's probably incredibly naive to assume that LLM data harvesters aren't using accounts.

You make a good point. Based on all the folks re-serving HN content, I assume HN has an API.

Ferret7446 20 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

[flagged]

spunker540 20 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I appreciate the mention of relevant and recent regulation proposals that may affect how future events like this are handled. I understand it did not cause this event but appreciate nonetheless.

gdulli 19 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The point is that the long-ongoing effort to weaken regulation leads to events like this as predicted, and further steps in that direction are powerfully incompetent.

yungbeto 20 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

[dead]

drivingmenuts a day ago | parent | prev [-]

Yeah, what this administration calls common sense is more like dumbass sense than anything else. On almost every level.

thephyber 21 hours ago | parent | next [-]

To zoom out, there’s a HUGE percentage of the US who uses “common sense” as a catch-all excuse to end all discussion.

In the debates I watch, they typically don’t have the mental capacity to steel man the opposition’s position so they can’t comprehend that someone else has a different intuition / “common sense” than them.

Beyond that, “common sense” has become a dog whistle to both virtual signal / vice signal to like-minded in groups and to deride outgroups. In a way, using that phrase is a way to dehumanize the person they are talking to.

lokar 20 hours ago | parent | next [-]

IME “common sense” is code for “we don’t need to listen to experts about this”

deepsun 17 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Well, that is literally it's definition: sense of the commons. In other words -- what masses feel.

I know it changed its meaning over time, but that was the original meaning.

andrekandre 18 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

to paraphrase a common meme: physics and chemicals don't care about your common sense

khana 18 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

[dead]

dboreham a day ago | parent | prev [-]

It's common sense if you're trying to make more money and are a psychopath.