Not easily but ultimately very simply if you give up on defending fuzzy concepts.

Faith in itself would be terrible, I can see no path where metaphysics binds machines. The chain of reasoning must be airtight and not grounded in itself.

Empiricism and naturalism only, you must have an ethic that can be argued against speculatively but can't be rejected without counter empirical evidence and asymmetrical defeaters.

Those are the requirements I think, not all of them but the core of it.