| ▲ | whenc 20 hours ago |
| It went un-noticed here, I think, but The Pragmatic Bookshelf recently fired most of its staff and are taking on no new books. In the email they sent to authors, they quoted a 40% YoY fall in non-fiction sales, industry-wide. |
|
| ▲ | roadside_picnic 16 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| As an avid reader (and sometimes writer) of technical books, it's sad to see the, perhaps inevitable, decline of the space. I still remember in the early 2000s Barnes and Noble would still have massive shelf space devoted to every technical topic you could imagine. I could spend hours just exploring what languages and topics there were I didn't even know existed. Powell's Technical Books used to be an entire separate store filled with books on every technical topic imaginable. The publishing industry veterans I've worked with told me it was even more incredible during the height of the dotcom boom: book sales in the 100,000 copy range was not that rare. Today I can only think of two truly technical book stores that still exist: The MIT Press Bookstore in Cambridge, MA and Ada Books in Seattle, WA. The latter, while a delightful store, has relegated the true technical book section to the backroom, which unfortunately doesn't seem to get refreshed too often (though, part of the beauty of this is it still has many of the weird old technical books that used to be everywhere). |
| |
| ▲ | marai2 12 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Same with the Stanford university bookstore. Was one of the better bookstores in the Bayarea. Used to have a whole room of technical, science, math books. It too is a shadow of its former self. So sad. | | |
| ▲ | zippyman55 8 hours ago | parent [-] | | I cry when I visit the Stanford Bookstore. In the 1980's if I needed any technical book, it was there. Now, just stupid clothing. |
| |
| ▲ | naikrovek 22 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > As an avid reader (and sometimes writer) of technical books, it's sad to see the, perhaps inevitable, decline of the space. When I think about this, I get a little bit scared. Imagine books going away, even if it's just the subcategory of technical books. The printed word has been around for a long time. The number of things that have been printed has always gone up. It really bothers me that that's changing. PDFs and websites are no substitute for printed paper bound in a cover. PDFs and websites are a fallback when the preferred media isn't available, they are not supposed to be the preferred media. All of the of the reasons that people have given over the years are applicable when it comes to why paper is superior for this. | |
| ▲ | rr808 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > told me it was even more incredible during the height of the dotcom boom I was a developer in the 90s before Netscape even came out. I didn't have a computer at home and dialup barely existed. If you wanted to do computer stuff you had to read. If you wanted to try a library you had to buy a CD from a bookstore or mail in an order which would get posted to you. | |
| ▲ | rmason 13 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I too am avid reader and was visiting five local bookstores on a weekly basis. Several of them had huge areas stocked with tech books. I had tried Amazon maybe six months after it launched and bought there sporadically. But almost any book i sought was available locally and the savings weren't worth the convenience of purchasing locally. Then in a three month period in late Spring 2000 all the programming books disappeared. Then my choice was between Amazon with quick delivery and the local store with a slower delivery and a higher price. So been buying from Amazon ever since and I can't remember the last time I have visited a bookstore. | |
| ▲ | seg_lol 15 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | The UW bookstore in Seattle like many big science schools had a wondrous technical book section. Isles of Springer. The bookstore itself is a shadow of its former shelf. | | |
| ▲ | zdragnar 14 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | My own college experience heavily soured me on both book stores and especially school run book stores. The markup was obscene and their buy back rates were worse. Half price books and a few other book stores lulled me back a few times, but nonfiction books are kept around mostly as eye candy at this point. | | |
| ▲ | bsder 13 hours ago | parent [-] | | All the US universities outsourced their bookstores. Now I can't even walk in and browse what books the various departments are using for classes, anymore. Everything is now behind bars and completely inaccessible. |
| |
| ▲ | 12 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | [deleted] | |
| ▲ | zippyman55 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Yes, I was so disappointed with my visit last year - not yet hopeless, but close to it. Elliott Bay Book Company in Seattle is a better place. | |
| ▲ | 14 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | [deleted] |
| |
| ▲ | senderista 14 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Ada's these days is more about politics than technology. | | |
| ▲ | zx8080 12 hours ago | parent [-] | | What kind of politics? I mean, what do they sell, little to no tech books? |
| |
| ▲ | jayde2767 14 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Weird, I have honestly never walked into a Barnes and Noble and had satisfaction with any of their technical content on the shelf. That pleasure died when we lost Borders. *Edit: spell correct kills me! | | |
| ▲ | aksss 13 hours ago | parent [-] | | Yeah, peak experience for me was when our town had both a Borders and B&N offering huge tech book sections. Then Borders closed. Then B&N became a toy store. |
| |
| ▲ | Mistletoe 12 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | This makes sense, "enough" of the old technical info is in the AI brains now and easily accessed via a query. | | |
| ▲ | TheOtherHobbes 11 hours ago | parent [-] | | A lossy compressed version of it, at least. But a lot of is also in blogs and (video) tutorials. As well as Stack Overflow. And all very searchable. The old brick-of-paper approach to tech manuals just isn't a thing any more. I don't particularly miss it. It was, if you think about, usually a slow and inefficient way to present information - often better at presenting what was possible than how to do make it happen. | | |
| ▲ | lazystar 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | > often better at presenting what was possible than how to do make it happen. that, i feel, is the chilling aspect to this situation. does the lack of new books explaining what's possible, imply that our society's opportunites for growth are dwindling? |
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | uxcolumbo 16 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| That's a shame. I got an email from them suggesting that they had a tough year. I bought 2 books even though I won't have time to read them anytime soon. Hopefully they'll find a way to keep going. |
|
| ▲ | adamors 19 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Wow, would be interested to read more about this, could you submit the email maybe as its own post? Even as a text version, I actually love the PragProg, would hate to seem them gone (but I guess it’s a foregone conclusion). |
| |
| ▲ | cultofmetatron 16 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I love pragprog but I think nonfiction books in dead tree form is going away. YEs, I know there are people who will pay for a physical book, just not enough to make for a profitable business. I myself spend around 200-300 usd on books every year. but I haven't bought a physical book in almost a decade. a pdf is perfectly fine. just sell it to me without DRM and have content thats worth the premium over wading through blogs. How can these companies move forward and update their business model? Personally, I pay for manning's subscription. $24/month all you can eat. I would love more of these publishers switching to a netflix style model. I consume a lot of short form technical content via blogs. would love a site where I can find medium written content with editorial oversight and quality control for technical correctness. obviously this costs money and it would be worth it to pay for that. I already do with manning. most of the content I consume are MEAPS. bleeding edge stuff that would likely be out of date by the time it makes it to dead paper form. This would be advantageous to the publishers as well. this shifts the focus to put the content on the web and mobile in ways that are easy to access. The publishers also get data on what gets consumed informing what technical resources to commission. | | |
| ▲ | fluorinerocket 14 hours ago | parent [-] | | I on the other hand can't stand PDFs. They take up valuable screen space, it is annoying to scroll to the sections you need.
Yeah yeah some PDFs have the side navigation thing. Most don't With a book I can put in those little flags to bookmark sections, I can easily riffle the pages and scan for the chapter I need, I can hand write in the margins I often need 2 or 3 books open to different sections, I like keeping them on my desk so I can glance at them when I need to I've probably cracked $1000 spent on books this year. | | |
| ▲ | diab0lic 10 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I’m similar to you. I recently went as far as to buy a pdf for an out of print book and then paid to have it printed and bound. I suppose a remarkable would be another route but… they are pricey. | | |
| ▲ | guiambros 8 hours ago | parent [-] | | Same; avid reader of printed books here. I have more pdfs I can count (most coming from Humble Bundle impulse buying), but nothing beats physical books for me. I got a remarkable pro, and it's just slightly better than screen. Being able to annotate books is actually a welcomed addition, and the screen is pretty decent. But flipping screen is slow (compared to a printed book), and going back and forth between pages is a hassle. Until we have the speed of a tablet (read: instant), with the screen quality of an e-ink, I don't think I'll voluntarily retire printed books. Now, I have an O'Reilly subscription (two actually, through school and ACM), but the app is sadly horrendous, as OP mentioned. Hard to believe this is actually their core business. |
| |
| ▲ | throw2312321 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I assume you read a lot. How do you consume books, and how do you organize knowledge? |
|
| |
| ▲ | whenc 19 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | ... | | |
|
|
| ▲ | tjr 19 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Is this because people seek knowledge from LLMs rather than from books now? Or is it because LLMs know everything that is in books, so people don't feel compelled to learn any more themselves? |
| |
| ▲ | AlotOfReading 19 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Definitely isn't the latter. Numerical Recipes and Hacker's Delight have tons of gems that you won't get from an LLM, or that an LLM will even understand despite appearing all their training sets. | | |
| ▲ | roadside_picnic 16 hours ago | parent [-] | | Even before LLMs became big I started hording solid technical books, as there was so much misinformation on Google/SO that any non-trivial technical question could not be answer without a high probability that the answer was fundamentally wrong. LLMs are super helpful for learning, but without the foundation of a true textbook at your side they will very easily go off the rails into a world of imagination. | | |
| ▲ | TSiege an hour ago | parent [-] | | Any recommendations for a few keepers a programmer should have? |
|
| |
| ▲ | keithnz 15 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | even before LLMs you could/can get a lot of info on the web. Most ideas presented in books exist on the internet somewhere, quite a few pass through HN. In the 90s and early 2ks I used to hoard books, but now, not so much, I get a few through my library these days but a lot of times I just find the book is padded out to be a book and the meaty bit of the book is usually tiny. | | |
| ▲ | kevstev 15 hours ago | parent [-] | | I also find that docs have gotten a lot better over time as well. I feel that Y2K era of numerous large tomes was largely to fill in the gap left after software publishers stopped shipping even their full price boxed software with meaty manuals, assuming I guess that help menus and GUI context (or maybe even Clippy) would get you there. Even some of the enterprisey software- Oracle comes to mind- would ship with like 6-10 volumes of reference information but very little in the way of a getting started guide that showed you how to get basic stuff up and running or what best practices were. The web got a little better, and what drove brainshare and usage was a good experience getting started with reasonable defaults and good docs to get you started. API design is also much better these days- I was trying to find some examples of how unintuitive say MFC (Microsoft Foundation Classes- big in the win9x days) apis were, but a lot of those docs seem to have disappeared- here is a stackoverflow/experts-exchange links that show how non-intuitive it was: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/3255207/window-handle-in...
https://www.experts-exchange.com/questions/10018203/How-to-g... Motif on the Unix side of things was a bit better, but not much. You really needed a good book to walk you through things in a more understandable way. |
| |
| ▲ | falcor84 19 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Another option might be that people are increasingly using LLMs to write the books. | | |
| ▲ | phantasmish 13 hours ago | parent [-] | | This is it. I know of too many companies (in nonfiction, specifically) trying to offload as much as possible to LLMs, damn the quality. Zero chance I buy any nonfiction written after 2021 or so unless it comes with strong recommendations from sources I trust. No more on-a-whim purchases because something looks interesting and is on sale or whatever. That’s over. | | |
| ▲ | nottorp 7 hours ago | parent [-] | | But even before LLMs, how many of those nonfiction books were any better than an assembly of random blog snippets? Damn few of them. I'm thinking the "industry" will contract a lot, but there will always be a niche for deep "real books" on a subject. It will just be much smaller. |
|
| |
| ▲ | riffic 19 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | loaded questions. | | |
| ▲ | tjr 19 hours ago | parent [-] | | Maybe a bit depressing, but I'm not sure loaded. I was just talking to someone (in person!) a few days ago, who purported that online courses were basically dead, because people can learn from LLMs instead. And then, it seems to be a real issue amongst some people to ask, "why should I learn X, when LLMs already know it?" Not unlike, "why should I learn to divide, when we have calculators?" but on a grander scale. | | |
| ▲ | pjbk 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Statements like these always brings me to memory the opening line of Hamming's Numerical Methods book: The purpose of computing is insight, not numbers. It is very easy to get carried away and forget that - in particular today when processing power grows exponentially. Even more when we know there are a myriad of problems that are uncomputable, literally, and human common sense and intuition (insight) are as relevant now as ever. | |
| ▲ | camdenreslink 16 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | My hypothesis is people will get burned out on this unguided learning via LLMs and still want some sort of curated/guided learning experience through material to understand some subject. There is the problem of "I don't know what I don't know" that a course can solve for you. An LLM can sort of do that, but you have to take its word for it, and it does it pretty much strictly worse at the moment (but is much more flexible). | | |
| ▲ | jcynix 13 hours ago | parent [-] | | > My hypothesis is people will get burned out on this unguided learning via LLMs [...] I'm less optimistic. Already 20+ years ago many people complained if you pointed them to books which answered their questions in depth. The standard reply was "just tell me how to solve this particular problem" instead. | | |
|
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | dehrmann 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Sibling comments are mostly saying they either started hoarding books or switched to some combination of blog posts, Stackoverflow, and LLMs. For those with books, how are you using them? |
|
| ▲ | anticorporate 19 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Honestly, I wonder how some of these publishers stay in business at all. I haven't written a book, but I've been a technical reviewer for friends who have been published with some of the larger technical publishers. Nobody was making money from the process. I do wonder if maybe they're just taking on too many titles and reaching saturation. Do we really need "The guide to making X on Y with Z" for every potential iteration? |
| |
| ▲ | falcor84 19 hours ago | parent [-] | | > Nobody was making money from the process. From the people I know who wrote or co-wrote books, the way you make money is in future interview processes. I don't know if they still do it, but when I interviewed for Google, they had a self-ranking system of how competent you are in each technology, and the only way to get the top score was phrased something like "I wrote the book on it (yes, an actual book)". |
|
|
| ▲ | vittore 20 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Anecdotal evidence, all books I bought this year were used. |
|
| ▲ | bwahah4 19 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| The shelf life of technology books is shorter than it takes to read them. Most were notebooks of students quickly edited into a learning tool. Oh wow more Python recipes. Another introduction to C++! The worlds moved on from valuing the latest DSL and additions to the Linux kernel. Just a fad marketed at GenX and older Millennials. SaaS is something tech billionaires need to exist. It's not something humanity needs. Not at the scale of the 2010s ZIRP fueled mania, anyway. Employers were using subscriptions to O'Reilly as a perk. No budget for perks in the AI and economic austerity era. Maps app, communication apps, media consumption are all most of the billions of smartphone users care about. |
| |