The article bullet point referencing WB Discovery could mislead some into thinking that this takeover is only for the Discovery portion, but that's not the case. $30 would not be for Discovery only (as Netflix's bid is $27.75), it's for the whole kit and caboodle. Yes there are two entities, but/and Paramount wants it all, and the takeover intent is for both.

▲

kenjackson 15 hours ago | parent [-]

I've heard that what Kushner wants is CNN. If they could make CBS+CNN lean conservative like Fox, they pull off a potential to swing the country via news media.

▲

KumaBear 14 hours ago | parent [-]

That's a shitty gamble when online media is where it is at now a days. These big media networks are dinosaurs hanging on by a thread.

▲

mywittyname 13 hours ago | parent | next [-]

The people who vote are the people also glued to 24hr news.

Plus, they already own all of the online media. The important bits, anyway.

▲

whycome 14 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

2028 is closer than you think. Dinosaur media still connect with dinosaur-voting audiences.

	▲	brookst 5 hours ago \| parent [-]
		And none of this is serious money to the Saudis and MAGA billionaires. If controlling this media ekes out a couple of percent in the midterms, it’s money well spent. A few tens of billions against consolidating power and bigger grifts? High ROI investment.

▲

kenjackson 14 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It might be. But if you're doing a short-term political power play (rather than a business investment), it could be a good tactical spend. And it might be a smart business investment if the political power play works in such way that you can politically bend the business environment in your favor.

	▲	actionfromafar 13 hours ago \| parent [-]
		And a cheap spend if you can scrounge the money in some roundabout way from Uncle Sam.

▲

TheCraiggers 13 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I think that's over-simplifying it. Some YouTube personality (or whatever we want to call 'online media' that isn't just CNN's website) isn't going to be getting a Whitehouse press pass anytime soon.

▲

BryantD 12 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Oh, they absolutely are. As Leavitt promised at her first briefing, it’s been opened to: "independent journalists, podcasters, social media influencers, and content creators."

	▲	KerrAvon 12 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Yes, all of them right-wing chuds.

▲

raw_anon_1111 11 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

You haven’t read about what’s going on at the Pentagon wanted the press to sign a release saying only approved content could be published? It was so onerous that even Fox News refused to sign. Now the press Corp is basically a bunch of right wing influencers.

https://www.npr.org/2025/12/03/nx-s1-5630076/the-press-corps...

Just in case you think this is just another liberal hit piece, let me repeat that Fox News refused to sign the agreement.

▲

jpadkins 11 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

A lot of YouTube political influencers have more viewers than CNN.

▲

Hikikomori 14 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Online media where they have x and Facebook already?