| ▲ | mixedbit a day ago |
| An interesting things is that GitHub is an expensive service and my guess would be that MS makes good money on it. Our small company paid about 200+ USD monthly for GitHub, much larger cumulative cost than Windows licenses. My believe was that Windows is getting worse, because it is considered legacy business by MS in favor of new offerings such as GitHub subscriptions. |
|
| ▲ | Normal_gaussian a day ago | parent | next [-] |
| Very many more people use Windows to GitHub. GitHub also runs a free tier with significant usage. There are ~1.4b paid instances of Windows 10/11 desktop; and ~150m Monthly active accounts on GitHub, of which only a fraction are paid users. Windows is generating something in the region of $30b/yr for MS, and GitHub is around $2b/yr. MS have called out that Copilot is responsible for 40% of revenue growth in GitHub. Windows isn't what developers buy, but it is what end users buy. There are a lot more end users than developers. Developers are also famously stingy. However, in both products the margin is in the new tech. |
| |
| ▲ | tonyhart7 a day ago | parent [-] | | github value maybe as not apparent as other product but github is pair well with MS other core product like Azure and VS/VSC department MS has a good chance to have vertical integration on how software get written from scratch to production, if they can somehow bundle everything to all in one membership like Google one subs, I think they have a good chance |
|
|
| ▲ | samhh a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I was surprised to learn that Depot runners, which are much faster, are also much cheaper. Would highly recommend them for anyone trapped on GitHub. |
| |
| ▲ | servercobra 21 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Blacksmith.sh has been great for us. Massively sped up tests and a huge improvement for Docker builds over both Actions and Google Cloud Build. Only downside is they never got back to us about their startup discount. | | |
| ▲ | bksmithconnor 21 hours ago | parent [-] | | hey there! blacksmith solutions engineer here :) love to hear we've helped speed up your tests and docker builds!! could you shoot me your GH org so I can apply your startup discount? feel free to reach out to support@blacksmith.sh and I'll get back to you asap.
thanks for using blacksmith! | | |
| |
| ▲ | 999900000999 a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Yeah, but I have to set that up. GitHub actions more or less just work for what most people need. If you have a complex setup, use a real CI/CD system. | | |
| ▲ | lijok 19 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I haven’t use depot but I’m pretty sure the setup is literally just switching out the runs-on value in your workflows | |
| ▲ | bastardoperator 20 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Such as? | | |
| ▲ | 999900000999 20 hours ago | parent [-] | | Jenkins is open source and very well documented. GitHub Actions are really for just short scripts. Don't take your Miata off road. | | |
|
| |
| ▲ | LilBytes a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Depot.dev is great. | | | |
| ▲ | kylegalbraith a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Thank you for the kind shout out! Always happy to see comments like this. If anyone is looking for a better GitHub or GitHub Actions experience, feel free to reach out anytime. | |
| ▲ | herpdyderp 21 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | What are Depot runners? | | |
| ▲ | kylegalbraith 20 hours ago | parent [-] | | Founder of Depot here. We provide faster and more reliable GitHub Actions runners (as well as other build performance services) at half the cost of GitHub [0] [0] https://depot.dev/ | | |
| ▲ | whiskey-one 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Is there a write up on the security of actions or equivalent that explains how they are secure both with direct and transitive dependencies? If this applies to Depot. | |
| ▲ | herpdyderp 18 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Ah got it, thanks. I thought there was another kind of GitHub runner (like their "large" runners) that I hadn't heard of. |
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | eviks a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| The legacy business usually explains why there are no new features, only minor maintenance, it doesn't explain why there is a lot of investment into work that makes it worse |
|
| ▲ | blibble a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I wouldn't be surprised if there isn't some plan to make all of GitHub's backend "legacy" and switch everyone to the dumpster fire that is Azure DevOps and if you thought GitHub Actions was bad... |
| |
| ▲ | everfrustrated a day ago | parent | next [-] | | When Microsoft bought GitHub they cancelled GitHubs own early CI effort and rebranded the existing Azure DevOps as GitHub Actions. The GitHub Actions runner source code is all dotnet. GitHub was a Ruby shop. | |
| ▲ | fuzzy2 a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | IIRC Azure DevOps was the “dead one”, all new development only takes place on GitHub. From my perspective, Azure Pipelines is largely the same as GitHub Actions. I abhor this concept of having abstract and opaque “tasks”. | | |
| ▲ | WorldMaker 20 hours ago | parent [-] | | There's direct evidence that GitHub Actions was the rewrite of Azure Pipelines that was originally planned to finish 5 years ago and got "stuck" (because all their resources moved to GitHub). For a while you could find 2020 roadmap repositories (on GitHub) for AzDO talking up a Pipelines rewrite bringing a lot more features (including better Docker alignment versus Pipelines' much more complex "runner skills") that instead showed up in the first version of GitHub Actions. Microsoft claims Azure DevOps still has a roadmap, but it's hard to imagine that the real roadmap isn't simply "Wait for more VPs in North Carolina to retire before finally killing the brand". |
| |
| ▲ | re-thc a day ago | parent | prev [-] | | > I wouldn't be surprised if there isn't some plan to make all of GitHub's backend "legacy" > and switch everyone to the dumpster fire that is Azure DevOps The other way around. Azure DevOps is 1/2 a backend for Github these days. Github re-uses a lot of Azure Devops' infrastructure. |
|
|
| ▲ | rurban a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| github doesn't pay microsoft for the azure runners. that's why they came up with actions at all. microsoft gets streetcreds for stable runners, github could replace travis and appveyor. |
|
| ▲ | Hamuko 21 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| It's not really that expensive. GitHub Enterprise is like $21/month/user while GitLab Ultimate was $100/month/user the last time GitLab published prices. These days GitLab Ultimate is "contact us for pricing" while the cheaper GitLab Premium is $29/month/user. I guess Bitbucket is cheaper but you'll lose the savings in your employees bitching about Bitbucket to each other on Slack. |
| |
|
| ▲ | Ygg2 a day ago | parent | prev [-] |
| > My believe was that Windows is getting worse, because it is considered legacy business by MS in favor of new offerings such as GitHub subscriptions. What if GH actions is considered legacy business in favour of LLMs? |
