Where do you see the authors? All I'm seeing is:

>Anonymous authors

>Paper under double-blind review

Either op mistakes the hallucinated citations for the authors (most likely, although there's almost no "middle eastern names" among them) Or he checked some that do have the names listed (I found 4, all had either Chinese names or "western" names) Anyway the great majority of papers (good or bad) I've seen have Indian or Chinese names attached, attributing bad papers to brown people having an inferior culture is just blatantly racist

▲

stainablesteel 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

you can google the papers and find the arxiv articles where the authors are listed

▲

titanomachy a day ago | parent | prev [-]

Yeah WTF? Both authors and reviewers are hidden. Is this comment just an attempt to whip up racist fervor?

▲

nyc_data_geek1 20 hours ago | parent [-]

Don't understand why you're being downvoted, here.

▲

Dylan16807 18 hours ago | parent [-]

Because the second sentence is inflammatory.

The side comment is right, it's about low versus high trust societies. Even if GP made a mistake on which names are relevant, they're not being racist about it.

	▲	7 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		[deleted]
	▲	titanomachy 16 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Yes, on looking more closely it’s possible that they made an honest mistake.