| ▲ | literalAardvark a day ago |
| There's plenty of evidence for those who want to learn instead of split hairs. I'd start with a search on "general intelligence factor". |
|
| ▲ | paulryanrogers a day ago | parent | next [-] |
| Is this the 'g' factor? What studies do you find compelling? Any done after the early 1900s or on adults? |
|
| ▲ | mmooss a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| So you've got nothing to offer? |
| |
| ▲ | foxglacier a day ago | parent | next [-] | | It's the scientific consensus not somebody's pet theory. So you don't need to get answers from here, you can get them from Google. | | |
| ▲ | tptacek 21 hours ago | parent [-] | | It's the consensus among g-theorists. "The scientific consensus" on cogntive function is Not A Thing. |
| |
| ▲ | literalAardvark a day ago | parent | prev [-] | | I answered your question clearly and in good faith. The rest of your diatribe is US styled epistemic theatre I don't feel the need to engage with, so I didn't. What exactly did your posts contribute? | | |
| ▲ | mmooss 19 hours ago | parent [-] | | You provided nothing but unsupported claims. Nobody else is doing your research for you. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | zapzupnz a day ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Are you really lmgtfy-ing on Hacker News? |