| ▲ | bhawks a day ago | ||||||||||||||||
| Android being Google's .NET, after Google being sued by coming up with Google's J++, Android Java dialect. The Oracle v Google was specifically over copyright infringement concerning the Java APIs used in Android's original implementation (Dalvik/ART), not about creating a "J++" dialect. Android never ran a JVM on mobile because it cannot be optimized for resource constrained devices a solution like DalvikVM was necessary. If you want to level critiques about creating fragmented dialects of Java I would recommend starting with J2ME. The only nice thing I can say about J2ME is at least it died. The Android ecosystem was far too mature for Fuchsia/Dart to be successful without a very compelling interop story that was never produced. As a technology Kotlin met Android's platform and community needs. Advocacy and politicking played a minimal, if any, role. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | pjmlp 19 hours ago | parent [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Lies sold by Google. Nokia and Sony Ericsson were using J2ME perfectly fine, as did Blackberry. I should know ad ex-Nokian. Kotlin met nothing, it was pushed by Kotlin heads working on Android Studio, telling lies comparing Kotlin to Java 7, instead of Java was already offering at the time. To this day they never do Kotlin vs Java samples, where modern Java is used, rather the version that bests fits their purpose to sell why Kotlin. Fragmentation, what a joke, the fragmentation got so bad in Android, that JetPack libraries, previously Android X, exist to work around the fragmentation and lack of OEM updates. Gosling said it better, regarding Google's "good" intentions https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZYw3X4RZv6Y&feature=youtu.be... | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||