| ▲ | noelwelsh a day ago |
| Everything is up to date with the new syntax as far as I'm aware. Also, the compiler and scalafmt can rewrite one to the other. A project can pick whatever style it wants and have CI reformat code to that style. |
|
| ▲ | lmm a day ago | parent | next [-] |
| > Everything is up to date with the new syntax as far as I'm aware. The Eclipse plugin isn't, and none of the newer IDE integrations is reliable. |
|
| ▲ | pjmlp a day ago | parent | prev [-] |
| When I checked a year ago, the IDE tooling still wasn't quite there. |
| |
| ▲ | spockz a day ago | parent | next [-] | | What I don’t get because there is LSP and BSP support. What else is needed to get support for scala 3 from an IDE? Obviously, Kotlin coming from Jetbrains will make it receive a lot more love and first class support. | | |
| ▲ | pjmlp a day ago | parent [-] | | Parity with Scala 2 development experience, which was lacking a year ago. | | |
| ▲ | theCodeStig 7 hours ago | parent [-] | | With Metals the Scala 3 development experience is better; plus one is no-longer tied to one specific IDE. |
|
| |
| ▲ | blandflakes a day ago | parent | prev [-] | | I always find downvoting on stuff like this perplexing. It still isn't there. I know that a lot of Scala people are doing metals and some kind of text editor experience, but if you've used something as powerful as Intellij, the Scala 3 experience is a serious downgrade, and it still is today, even though it's better than it was a year ago. |
|