| ▲ | 4gotunameagain a day ago | |
Depends on the region. MISRA is widely adopted, and then there are the US MIL standards, ECSS for european aerospace stuff, do-178C for aviation.. | ||
| ▲ | pacoWebConsult 9 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
DO-178c is not a coding standard, it's a process standard. Projects following DO-178c processes would adopt a coding standard as a part of the process, reviewing software deliverables adhere to those standards. | ||
| ▲ | westurner 20 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
/?hnlog awesome-safety-critical From https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45562815 : > awesome-safety-critical: https://awesome-safety-critical.readthedocs.io/en/latest/ From "Safe C++ proposal is not being continued" (2025) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45237019 : > Safe C++ draft: https://safecpp.org/draft.html Also there are efforts to standardize safe Rust; rust-lang/fls, rustfoundation/safety-critical-rust-consortium > How does what FLS enables compare to these [unfortunately discontinued] Safe C++ proposals? | ||