> AI is not the problem, laziness and negligence is.

As much as I agree with you that this is wrong, there is a danger in putting the onus just on the human. Whether due to competition or top down expectations, humans are and will be pressured to use AI tools alongside their work and produce more. Whereas the original idea was for AI to assist the human, as the expected velocity and consumption pressure increases humans are more and more turning into a mere accountability laundering scheme for machine output. When we blame just the human, we are doing exactly what this scheme wants us to do.

Therefore we must also criticize all the systemic factors that puts pressure on reversal of AI‘s assistance into AI’s domination of human activity.

So AI (not as a technology but as a product when shoved down the throats) is the problem.

Absolutely, expectations and tools given by management are a real problem.

If management fires you because they are wrong about how good AI is, and you're right - at the end of the day, you're fired and the manager is in lalaland.

People need to actually push the correct calibration of what these tools should be trusted to do, while also trying to work with what they have.