| ▲ | hiddencost a day ago | |||||||
Every Google publication goes through multiple review. If anyone thinks the publication is a competitor risk it gets squashed. It's very likely no one is using this architecture at Google for any production work loads. There are a lot of student researchers doing fun proof of concept papers, they're allowed to publish because it's good PR and it's good for their careers. | ||||||||
| ▲ | hustwindmaple a day ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
The amazing thing about this is the first author has published multiple high-impact papers with Google Research VPs! And he is just a 2nd-year PhD student. Very few L7/L8 RS/SWEs can even do this. | ||||||||
| ▲ | Balinares 17 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
I mean, they did publish the word2vec and transformers papers, which are both of major significance to the development of LLMs. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | jeffbee a day ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
Underrated comment, IMHO. There is such a gulf between what Google does on its own part, and the papers and source code they publish, that I always think about their motivations before I read or adopt it. Think Borg vs. Kubernetes, Stubby vs. gRPC. | ||||||||