> It sets the rule that things must be actually read when there’s a social expectation (code interviews for example) but otherwise… remarks that use of LLMs to assist comprehension has little downside.

I think you got this backwards, because I don't think the RFD said that at all. The point was about a social expectation for writing, not for reading.

This is what I’m referencing:

>using LLMs to assist comprehension should not substitute for actually reading a document where such reading is socially expected.