Remix.run Logo
14 7 hours ago

Not stupid. Just experiencing life and sometimes amazing experiences have a chance of danger. You get to choose what risk levels you are okay with. Props to that ranger who agreed with that belief.

kbenson 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Choosing your risk level and working within it isn't stupid. Not knowing the risk when it's easy to gather some more info and then acting in ignorance is, which is what GP was describing, and likely why they called their own actions stupid.

ridgeguy 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

At that time, we had no kids & no pets, nobody directly dependent on us. That figured in our conversation on the drive to Hilo. Nowdays, we might come to a different conclusion, but I'm glad for the path we chose then.

serf 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

it's all whimsy and adventure -- but the reality is that you're not just risking your own lives but also the lives of potential rescuers.

just food for thought. I'm not about to say one should lead a safe and sterile life, but there is more to it than direct dependents.

ljlolel 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Though rescuers did consciously choose that role and that they’d be saving ignorant people very often

parineum 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Rescuers choose their jobs too.

bombcar 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Especially since that path didn’t collapse ;)