| ▲ | ceejayoz 7 hours ago | |
> This correlated with an earthquake… Plenty of disasters don't. "No earthquake, no incident" obviously can't be the logic tree. > In the UK (and elsewhere) a large percentage of track is covered by cameras - inspection of over the top claims can be rapidly dismissed. "Yes. That doesn't do much to detect a stone from a parapet rolling onto the line though. Hence the need for inspection." Sounds like you now agree it's less a need? > Sounds like a case for cyber crimes and public nuisance. "Sorry, not much we can do." As is the case when elderly folks get their accounts drained over the phone today. | ||