| ▲ | bryancoxwell 8 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Find it interesting that the section about LLM’s tells when using it for writing is absolutely littered with emdashes | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | bccdee 8 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
To be fair, LLMs usually use em-dashes correctly, whereas I think this document misuses them more often than not. For example: > This can be extraordinarily powerful for summarizing documents — or of answering more specific questions of a large document like a datasheet or specification. That dash shouldn't be there. That's not a parenthetical clause, that's an element in a list separated by "or." You can just remove the dash and the sentence becomes more correct. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | minimaxir 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
You can stop LLMs from using em-dashes by just telling it to "never use em-dashes". This same type of prompt engineering works to mitigate almost every sign of AI-generated writing, which is one reason why AI writing heuristics/detectors can never be fully reliable. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | matt_daemon 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
I believe Bryan is a well known em dash addict | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | anonnon 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
There was a comment recently by HN's most enthusiastic LLM cheerleader, Simon Willison, that I stopped reading almost immediately (before seeing who posted it), because it exuded the slop stench of an LLM: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46011877 However, I was surprised to see that when someone (not me) accused him of using an LLM to write his comment, he flatly denied it: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46011964 Which I guess means (assuming he isn't lying) if you spend too much time interacting with LLMs, you eventually resemble one. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||