What the ? I am either too old, or stupid, or both, to understand this. I'd expect this bullshit from Consultants.

askedrelic 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

This matches some previous comments around LLMs driving adoption of programming languages or frameworks. If you ask Claude to write a web app, why not have it use your own framework, that it was trained on, by default?

	▲	fishmicrowaver an hour ago \| parent [-]
		Users are far more likely to ask it about shadcn, or material, than about node/deno/bun. So, what is this about?

▲

ojame 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Currently Claude etc. can interact with services (including AWS) via MCPs.

What the user you're replying to is saying the Bun acquisition looks silly as a dev tool for Node. However if you look at their binding work for services like s3[0], the LLM will be able to interact directly with cloud services directly (lower latency, tighter integration, simplified deployment).

0: https://bun.com/docs/runtime/s3

	▲	mrcsharp 2 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		That doesn't make sense either. Agents already have access to MCPs and Tools. Your example is solved by having an S3 wrapper as a set of tools.
	▲	fishmicrowaver 2 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		An AI company scoops up frontend tech. Do you really think it was because of s3?