Remix.run Logo
yandie 2 hours ago

$250 per child, at 5% interest rate, compounded in 18 years, you'd get $601.65.

Even in today's money, I wouldn't call it a "head start"

piker 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Trivial for a lot of people, sure, but imagine the difference between not knowing what an investment account is and knowing that you've got $250 in one that you can contribute more to.

codeddesign 2 hours ago | parent [-]

So..a 401k At least the 401k is pre-tax. This on the other hand is taxed on both ends. Maybe I am missing something, but I really don’t see the upside.

dmoy an hour ago | parent | next [-]

It's more like a 529, but can also be used for first home purchase as a qualified withdrawal.

It's also tax-free growth (not that the average <18 y/o would incur any tax on $250-$1250 of principle)

piker 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Yes. You know, like the kind of 401k a seven year old has.

an hour ago | parent | prev [-]
[deleted]
Retric an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

A little help for millions likely ends up mattering for some of them. It’s a head start in that it removes a single minor issue, shows the value of compound interest in a more tangible way, or possibly gets them to retirement weeks/months earlier.

Obviously many people are happy to spend whatever, but with 25 million people you’ll see a wide range of personalities and life situations. Imagine an otherwise identical life without 600 dollars of credit card debt, that’s a worth quite a bit over time and will likely apply to some of these individuals. Perhaps a musical instrument or similar purchase will end up really helping someone kid, you never really know.

najarvg an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

If you add in the 1000$ that treasury plans to invest starting next year, that is $1250 compounded at 5% annually after 18 years to $3008.27. It's probably still not a "head start" given that inflation is assumed to nominally rise at 2.5 to 3.5% annually and will take a bite out of what the real value is worth in 18 years. Good intentions but misplaced as others have stated. Investing in other ways to provide upward economic mobility will provide much better ROI for the society than allowing most of the wealth to accrue to a handful of people

magicalist an hour ago | parent [-]

> If you add in the 1000$ that treasury plans to invest starting next year, that is $1250

This is largely separate from your point, which is good, but the $250 is for kids that won't get the $1000. The $1000 only goes to kids born between 2025 and 2028.

stetrain 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Enough for one college textbook.

qntmfred 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

one of my kids is a senior in high school. they'd be quite content to have an extra $600 in their pocket. also...

> beginning next year, the U.S. Treasury will contribute $1,000 to the Invest America account of every baby born on or after January 1, 2025

hopefully more people/organizations will decide to contribute as well.

LastTrain an hour ago | parent [-]

Maybe if we grovel hard enough!

aksss 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

If that’s all that’s ever added, but keep in mind the idea is to provide the foundation for making easy, low-drag contributions going forward.

newsclues 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

For a single kid, maybe.

But what if 10 or twenty of them want to start a company? Maybe they have some savings or can get parents to chip in or a grant, but they can’t open a store and work it, or start a landscaping business or a software company.

xqcgrek2 an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

If there was a wealth tax on every billionaire, it could be a factor of 100 or 1000 higher.

throwforfeds 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I mean you could buy books your first semester of your $75k/year freshman year of college though! Think of all the new Calculus that'll be in the 23rd edition of the standard textbook that costs $150. /s