>This seems super mild.

To you.

throwuxiytayq 32 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

If you find these pictures distressing, you might want to consider consciously and carefully exposing yourself to more of the same to build a minimal amount of tolerance. I’m pretty sure it’s literally impossible to go through life without experiencing (sometimes personally) medical conditions that are significantly more visually unpleasant. I’m not a huge fan of the meat-creature-universe we all rolled, but it literally is what it is.

▲

buellerbueller 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Yes; that's my point. Is there a way of making the internet better, such that this can be handled more seamlessly, so that the people impacted by things that others find mild can just...avoid it?

Not all internet has a landing page where someone can post a "trigger warning" (for lack of a better term). Nor should it: trigger warnings don't work, and may even be harmful.

	▲	kulahan 27 minutes ago \| parent \| next [-]
		I don't think it's going to work to aggressively hide from anything moderately uncomfortable for the rest of one's browsing experience.
	▲	toss1 37 minutes ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Now this actually sounds like a good use-case for LLM/'AI'-enhanced browsers. Everyone has different triggers and YUK! levels and it would take an insane amount of time & effort to encode all that, and setup on each different person's client side, but an 'AI-browser' with 'smart filtering' (or whatever they'd call it) would likely be quick to setup for each user's (dis-)tastes and be quite flexible in recognizing the patterns and taking the desired action (hide, warn, summarize w/o the triggers, sanitize, etc.). Maybe it already exists(?) but I've avoided 'AI-browsers', keeping my use in their apps/sites.

▲

ericmcer 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

It's a dogs nose with a scab on it lol