| ▲ | simonw 4 hours ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Because they have a product that makes $1bn+ a year that depends on having a good, stable, cross-platform JS runtime. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | krashidov 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
I'm still confused. Why not just pour a ton of resources into it since it's open source. I guess dev mindshare? It is a great product | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | LunaSea 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
You're describing Node.js which has existed for the last 15 years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | altmanaltman 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
but they are a company that burns billions every year in losses and this seems like a pretty random acquisition. Bun is the product that depends on providing that good, stable, cross-platform JS runtime and they were already doing a good job. Why would Anthropic's acquisition of them make them better at what they were already doing? | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | pzo 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ok but node is even more stable and mature - compare node api parity in bun and also issue of bun vs node | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | sneak 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
That doesn’t require or benefit from acquiring Bun. Node continues to exist and serve fine. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||