Nope, a[b] is equivalent to *(a + b) regardless of a and b.

Given that, why don't we use just `*(a + b)` everywhere?

Wouldn't that be more verbose and less confusing? (genuinely asking)

	▲	tomsmeding an hour ago \| parent [-]
		Do you really think that `*(a + i)` is clearer than `a[i]`?