As a side note of appreciation, I think that we can't do better than what he did for being transparent that LLM was used but still just for the proof-reading.

It does make me curious about the what the super anti-ai people will do.

Matt Godbolt is, obviously, extremely smart and has a lot of interesting insight. But... this was LLM-assisted.

So, anyone who has previously said they'll never (knowingly) read anything that an ai has touched (or similar sentiment) are you going to skip this series? Make an exception?