My two cents, this seems like a case where it’s better to wait for the person’s response instead of guessing.

darkwater 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Fair enough. Anyway I wasn't trying to say what actually changed GP's life, I was just expressing my opinion on what video models could potentially bring as an improvement to a blind person.

▲

nkmnz 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

My two cents, this seems like a comment it should be up to the OP to make instead of virtue signaling.

▲

tippa123 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> Can you share some ways AI has changed your life?

A question directed to GP, directly asking about their life and pointing this out is somehow virtue signalling, OK.

▲

throwup238 3 hours ago | parent [-]

You can safely assume that anyone who uses “virtue signaling” unironically has nothing substantive to say.

	▲	SV_BubbleTime 14 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		>[People who call out performative bullshit should be ignored because they’re totally wrong and I totally mean it.] Maybe you’re just being defensive? I’m sure he didn’t mean an attack at you personally.

▲

foobarian 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Yall could have gotten a serviceable answer about this topic out of ChatGPT. 2025 version of "let me google that for you"

▲

MangoToupe 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

...you know, people can have opinions about the best way to behave outside of self-aggrandizement, even if your brain can't grasp this concept.

▲

fragmede 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

From the list of virtues, which one was this signaling?

https://www.virtuesforlife.com/virtues-list/

	▲	efs24 42 minutes ago \| parent \| next [-]
		I’d guess: Respect, consideration, authenticity, fairness. Or should I too perhaps wait for OP to respond.
	▲	SV_BubbleTime 12 minutes ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		That list needs updating. Lots of things became virtuous in scenario. During Covid, fear was a virtue. You had to prove how scared you were of it, all the masks you wore because it made you “one of the good ones” to be fearful.

▲

meindnoch 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

[flagged]

	▲	Moomoomoo309 2 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		The two cents are not literally monetary - your opinion is literally the two cents. You're contributing your understanding to the shared pot of understanding and that's represented by putting money into the pot, showing you have skin in the game. It's contributing to a larger body of knowledge by putting your small piece in - the phrases you suggest don't have that context behind them and in my opinion are worse for it. The beauty of the phrase is because the two cents are your opinion, everyone has enough, because everyone can have an opinion. The lens through which you're analyzing the phrase is coloring how you see it negatively, and the one I'm using is doing the opposite. There is no need to change the phrase, just how it's viewed, I think.
	▲	kachapopopow 2 hours ago \| parent \| prev \| next [-]
		people put too much weight onto words, the first lesson I learned on the internet is that words are harmless, might be deeply painful for some, but because people as my self put no weight behind them we don't even have a concept of keeping such things mindful since it never crosses our minds and it's really difficult to see if any other way even if we try to since it just seems like a bad joke. And when I say 'it never crosses our minds' I really mean it, there's zero thoughts between thinking about a message and having it show up in a text box. A really great example are slurs, for a lot of people they have to double take, but there's zero extra neurons fired when I read them. I guess early internet culture is to blame since all kinds of language was completely uncensored and it was very common to run into very hostile people/content.
	▲	georgebcrawford 2 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		> The metaphor of assigning a literal monetary value to one's opinion reinforces the idea that contributions are transactional and that their "worth" is measured through an economic lens. That framing can be exclusionary, especially for people who have been historically marginalized by economic systems. It subtly normalizes a worldview where only those with enough "currency" - social, financial, or otherwise - deserve to be heard. No. It’s acknowledging that that perhaps one’s opinion may not be as useful as somebody else’s in that moment. Which is often true! Your first and third paragraphs are true, but they don’t apply to every bloody phrase.