| ▲ | clintonc 2 hours ago |
| Curious to know what makes this "a proper VT100 implementation in the browser, not a JavaScript approximation of one" -- isn't Ghostty also an approximation, just implemented in a different language? Seems unnecessarily pejorative to me. |
|
| ▲ | 0x1ch an hour ago | parent | next [-] |
| Aren't terminals also called... terminal emulators? All modern terminals would be an approximation by this logic. Some approximate backwards compatibility with VT** spec more than others. |
|
| ▲ | kylecarbs 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Agreed. I removed "not a JavaScript approximation of one" from the README. |
| |
| ▲ | chjj an hour ago | parent [-] | | I don't mean to derail discussion about a cool project, but it still seems to imply xterm.js is somehow "improper" emulation (though I might be misreading it). Terminal emulators are all approximations of terminals, regardless of the programming language. | | |
| ▲ | kylecarbs an hour ago | parent [-] | | They are approximations but Ghostty has intentional effort towards correctness, more than I've seen from other terminal emulators. | | |
| ▲ | chjj an hour ago | parent [-] | | Fair enough. I haven't looked at the internals of ghostty, so I'll take your word for it. I'm probably also just taking things personally. |
|
|
|