| ▲ | RankingMember 10 hours ago |
| > I don't think RTO or fewer meetings is going to reverse or even slow Instagram's slide down the enshittification chute. In my view it's been well down that chute since shortly after its acquisition by Facebook. Facebook bought them as a hedge as young people left the FB platform and, for a time, it's worked to keep users under the Meta umbrella, but as with everything Zucc touches, the end-user experience has been in a state of steady degradation. |
|
| ▲ | sunaookami 10 hours ago | parent [-] |
| It's also impressive how fast Zuckerberg ruined Threads, does anyone still uses this? Does it still keep reverting to the algorithmic timeline? |
| |
| ▲ | RankingMember 10 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Ha, I completely forgot about it already- that's how quickly it became irrelevant. | | |
| ▲ | mmahd7456 10 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | The only reason I don't forget it is because they advertise on Instagram. | |
| ▲ | SV_BubbleTime 10 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I’d like a retrospective on “if you don’t like what Twitter is doing, you can build your own”… because it seems network effects are real, despite Facebook money. | | |
| ▲ | Nextgrid 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | It seems they did like what Twitter was doing, because it's the same thing with the same problems. No wonder nobody uses it, why use a knockoff when the real thing is free? |
|
| |
| ▲ | 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | [deleted] | |
| ▲ | Traubenfuchs 10 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | It‘s still being pushed via… "ads“ in between stories or posts where you see a sneak peek of a Threads post you might like. |
|