| ▲ | bee_rider 6 hours ago | |||||||
It is nice to see a country take it seriously of course. But, at some level I don’t love this type phrasing that has become generally accepted—it is a big deal, so we declare it a national security risk. Everything is a national security risk when we look generally enough. Climate, education, economics, cultural diversity: failing in any of these fields makes the country weaker in some abstract way and that will impact national security down the road. “This impacts the general welfare and quality of life of the people” should be the highest category of urgent problem that needs to be fixed. A healthy, happy, productive populace can solve national security as a side effect. | ||||||||
| ▲ | happyopossum 5 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||
> A healthy, happy, productive populace can solve national security as a side effect. I think many “healthy, happy, productive” societies that have been invaded by less happy and productive neighbors throughout all of recorded history would beg to disagree. | ||||||||
| ||||||||