I can’t imagine the various legislatures in several “highly skeptical” states that are either considering or have already implemented “no chemtrails” and fluoride laws are going to find it easy to convince people to allow cloud seeding. Pretty sure Tennessee already preemptively banned it.

▲

Redster 10 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Yes, TN did pass that. Much of TN (especially around the capital) is temperate rainforest, so I imagine the lawmakers perceived downsides, but not upsides. Unfortunately, there is conflation or confusion between cloudseeding and sunlight reflection methods.

I hope to see this legislation in TN changed to allow cloudseeding.

▲

bad_haircut72 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Most of that idiotic crap goes out the window when real problems show up. I do believe Texans will get the same "pray for rain" BS we're laughing at Iran for now though.

▲

mkoubaa 10 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Nothing a golf course ban couldn't reverse

▲

DANmode 10 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Are you sure?

▲

kcplate 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Ahh yes, the old “let’s outlaw those things I don’t like, but others do that has billion dollar industries supporting it” approach. That always goes over well.

▲

BolexNOLA 8 hours ago | parent [-]

Is there a better argument for golf courses than “think of the jobs”?

▲

kcplate 7 hours ago | parent [-]

Sure. It’s a recreation that many people get joy from doing…

Just because it may not be “your thing”…doesn’t mean it’s not worth having.

▲

slumberlust 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I enjoy playing golf and also realize how wasteful it is. Id support repurposing the spaces near me for parks/zoning usage.

▲

kcplate an hour ago | parent [-]

Parks need to be landscape maintained, so does new development—-often in very similar ways that a golf course is (water, chemical, maintenance). Unless around you simply doesn’t have the open land space to support the area’s park and development needs, what is actually wasted?

I think folks get caught up on golf course water usage, but every course around me uses reclaimed water. If houses were built there, that would no longer be reclaimed water, but potable water. Also I am convinced that landscape chemical usage would go up as well.

I have close family and friends in the business, I guarantee that huge efforts go into making sure not a single drop of irrigation isn’t used unless it’s needed. I can tell you that my neighbors don’t pay that much attention to their exact irrigation needs—simply watering for as long as they can, when they can. I doubt seriously that replacing a golf course with more homes would net much water savings…at least around me.

	▲	BolexNOLA 32 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		Public parks directly serve way more people than golf courses and don’t discriminate based on income (or class, ethnicity, etc) to the same degree, if at all.

▲

BolexNOLA 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I have absolutely enjoyed my time on the golf course, but much like recreational cruise ships I’ll be perfectly content with them gone too. Just because I enjoy something doesn’t mean I can’t appreciate how wasteful it is and would oppose ending or at least reducing it.

▲

kcplate an hour ago | parent [-]

I just don’t see the waste. Unless you are just going to let those spaces go wild again you will have similar efforts to maintain the spaces and with potential similar water usage.

	▲	BolexNOLA 26 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		> you will have similar efforts to maintain the spaces and with potential similar water usage. For more people across a broader socio-economic background. I mean come on let’s just acknowledge the elephant in the room: golf is a rich sport for upper-income/rich people that requires a massive amount of space that then often has a deleterious effect on surrounding real estate (i.e. inflates it and prices people out).